Posted by: salamandercandy | December 19, 2006

Who’s Watching?

A major hurdle in getting people to act in environmentally friendly ways is that we are rarely held responsible for our actions. No one even notices most of the choices we make. Did you recycle that bottle? Did you buy sustainably-raised food this week? Chances are that no one else knows, and most of these acts have no visible consequence for our own lives. So what’s the motivation to be good?

Many religions teach that God is keeping tabs on us. Others emphasize that our dead ancestors are watching what we do. Even Santa Claus knows when we are sleeping and when we are awake. This is a persistent theme among traditional religious beliefs. The idea that someone is looking over your shoulder is a powerful motivator, and it probably influences how a lot of people act.

But what if you’re a skeptic? What if you’re not sure that any divine being is looking down on us? Maybe you think of your ancestors as still living in the grass and flowers that their bodies have become, but you doubt that they still have a conscious mind that can see you. And maybe you even believe that the North Pole is a vast ice field without any toy factories at all. Is nobody watching?

Our descendents might be watching. They are probably the most feasible observers given our modern scientific understanding of how the universe works. The idea that our grandchildren will have the technology to literally watch the goings-on of today on a video screen has been explored in science fiction (e.g. Pastwatch: the Redemption of Christopher Columbus by Orson Scott Card, and the recent movie Déjà Vu). I don’t know if our ability to reconstruct the past will become that powerful. More realistically, our descendents will experience the consequences of our actions: if we waste resources and soil the planet today, we’re screwing them over tomorrow. But the thought of future humans watching what we are doing right now taps into that primal part of the brain that fears the judgment of others. And for some of us, it’s easier to believe in than, say, angels are.

As far as I know, no religion has made observant descendents part of its dogma. This is ironic, because the idea is so similar to the observant ancestors idea that has been so important in many cultures (e.g. in ancient China and several African societies). To me, at least, it makes more sense to behave morally for the sake of my descendents than for the sake of my ancestors. And I know it’s not just me… most people probably value their children more than anything else, and they work very hard to ensure that their children, and grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, will be well-off and happy. Many people don’t think about the effects of all their actions, though. Why spend years working to pay for your children’s education while at the same time giving them an impoverished planet to inherit? People already have the right core values, namely, we seek the welfare of our decendents, and respect and honor from others. If we just get people to imagine their descendents watching them, maybe they’ll start to behave more justly.

As the Iroqouis’ Great Law of Peace advises, we should consider the effects of our actions for seven generations to come. Because, perhaps, they will know what you did last generation.



  1. Good post. It’s hard to get people to even think about the future… there are parents driving the kids around in an SUV, mindlessly wasting limited resources and polluting the air.

    IT’s a mindset and a lifestyle change that needs to come. One way I try appealing to people is to consider how much driving costs them. Money seems to be all that matters to a large segment of the population. They couldn’t care less about the health of the planet.

    If people are part of the self-centered, dumb American mindset, it’s seemingly a lost cause. Plus, I don’t have the patience to try walking them to the path of understanding… instead, it’s, “You IDIOT! Why did you just race up to the red light? You wasteful piece of crap!”

  2. Another obstacle is to get people to believe that certain actions matter. Some people don’t believe that driving an SUV is harmful to their descendants or that sustainably-raised food is any more than liberal hooey. I secretly think part of the reason they don’t believe is that they don’t want to because then they WOULD have to worry about their descendants. Another part is that education about it just hasn’t saturated yet. It’s frustrating because while we are waiting for that saturation to come, the damage is growing exponentially worse.

    This reminded me of a short article I read recently (don’t remember where) about light greens vs. dark greens. Both are environmentally conscious, but people who are light green will put it into practice when it is easy for them; while people who are dark green will change their lives to live consistently with those beliefs. It posited that making environmentally friendly decisions easier (i.e. access to sustainable foods) will really help the cause as there are people out there that are ready to do it, if only they didn’t have to go so far out of their way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: